Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual vs Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

15 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy TCe 90HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Suzuki SX4 II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 VVT 120HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic gearbox.

Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4
Renault

15 reasons for Renault Captur Energy TCe 90KM manual in comparison to Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
115

Average consumption

5.1 > 5.8 l
The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual burns up 0.7 l less fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 II. The Renault, being classified in „compact SUV” segment burns up by 2.4 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
54

Urban consumption

6 > 6.8 l
The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual consumes 12 percent fewer fuel running around the town in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 II. The Renault, that comes from compact SUV segment, consumes 3.6 l less gasoline. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the urban for the compact SUV segment is 9.6 l, whereas the Renault Captur needs by 37 percent less amount of fuel than the average.
29

Maximal torque RPM

2,500 > 4,400 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the maximum torque is produced shows us how fast an engine achieves its best efficiency with growth in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the wider range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration is felt earlier.
28

Top speed

171 > 165 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Renault is greater compared with this of the Suzuki SX4 II by 6 kilometers per hour, which allows the Renault Captur to cover faster long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 6 km/h is little and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
23

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 4.9 l
20

Width

1,778 > 1,762 mm
Width of a vehicle affects interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The Renault Captur is widther only by 16 millimeters in relation to the Suzuki and is not really worth considering. The average for the „compact SUV” segment equals to around 1,797 mm and is by 1 percent bigger than the width of the Renault.
16

Wheelbase

2,601 > 2,595 mm
The Renault Captur has 6 millimeters longer wheelbase in comparison to Suzuki SX4 II. Consequently the Renault Captur is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable riding.
16

Range

918 > 877 km
13

Urban range

750 > 735 km
8

Extra-urban range

1,047 > 1,000 km
7

Maximum load capacity

557 > 540 kg
3

Rear track

1,514 > 1,505 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

867 > 888 mm
0

Rear overhang

650 > 811 mm

Suzuki

13 reasons for Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Reasons for
137

Maximal power

120 > 90 hp
The Suzuki comes with petrol which makes by 33 percent more horsepower than the the engine of the Renault Captur, giving the vehicle a much more sporty character. It should be googd option to those who would like to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

156 > 135 Nm
Maximum torque of the Suzuki SX4 II is 16 percent bigger than the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. Because of this, the Suzuki SX4 II will accelerate somewhat better and be better to overtake other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine may also make that the Suzuki SX4 II will use on average fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
36

Trunk capacity

431 > 377 l
If you need a vehicles by which you could set of for journeys, which could contain more things in the boot , pick the Suzuki. The Renault Captur has by 54 liters less capable boot in relation to the Renault so you would be able to put in the trunk one little suitcase less. When it comes to the luggage compartment check its dimensions which have considerable impact on loading possibility .
20

Fuel tank

50 > 46 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4 that can carry 9 percent more fuel compared with the Renault Captur. The average fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 segment, which is represented by the Suzuki, is 61 l, whereas in mini 4x4 class (represented by the Renault) it amounts to 61 liters.
12

Cylinders

4 > 3
9

Length

4,295 > 4,122 mm
The Suzuki SX4 II is 4 % longer than the Renault. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually provide plenty of trunk space. While the Suzuki seems to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate soft, smooth long-distance driving that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Renault Captur may appeal to women because it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Engine capacity

1,587 > 899 cc
The engine capacity of the Suzuki is by 688 cc larger than the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. For this reason the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual will be more fuel efficient, however, the engine of the Suzuki will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
2

Height

1,574 > 1,566 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of large dimensions, the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4, which is by 8 mm higher than the Renault Captur, would be better choice for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic transmission in the Suzuki SX4 II despite having a few disadvantages gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel you probably would be more rested. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.
0

Valves

16 > 12
0

Payload

1,735 > 1,662 kg
0

Front track

1,538 > 1,529 mm
0

Curb weight

1,195 > 1,100 kg

Cars specifications

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP automatic 4x4
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Price range popular popular
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 1,662 kg 1,735 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK