Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual vs Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

14 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy TCe 90HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

13 reasons for

Suzuki SX4 II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 VVT 120HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
Renault

14 reasons for Renault Captur Energy TCe 90KM manual in comparison to Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.1 > 5.6 l
The Renault uses 0.5 l fewer in the combined cycle in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. The difference in the amount of 9 % is not realy noticeable. However within some time it would give a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 6.8 l
The Renault Captur burns up of 12 % fuel less in the urban cycle in comparison to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. The Renault Captur, which is classified in small off-road 4x4 segment, burns up of 3.6 l/100Km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “small off-road 4x4” class is 9.6 l of fuel for every 100 km.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,500 > 4,400 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the maximum torque is delivered indicates how fast an engine achieves its full performance with increase in rmp. The lower revolutions or the wider range in which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.3 > 4.7 l
22

Width

1,778 > 1,762 mm
distance between left and right side of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers as well as stability on road. The Renault Captur is widther only by 16 mm compared with the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual and is not really important. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” class amounts to around 1,797 millimeters and is by 19 mm bigger than the same feature of the Renault Captur.
19

Range

918 > 909 km
15

Wheelbase

2,601 > 2,595 mm
The Renault has 6 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to Suzuki SX4 II. Consequently the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
12

Urban range

750 > 735 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,047 > 1,042 km
4

Rear track

1,514 > 1,505 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

867 > 888 mm
0

Rear overhang

650 > 811 mm
0

Curb weight

1,100 > 1,090 kg

Suzuki

13 reasons for Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120KM manual in comparison to Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

120 > 90 hp
The horsepower is a feature that most of car fans take into account at first when buying a car. In this case it is the Suzuki which has by 33 percent more horsepower when compared to the Renault. Consequently the Suzuki SX4 II will reach higher velocity. Having more horsepower the Suzuki SX4 II should as well give seemingly more flexiblility in specific gears.
59

Maximal torque

156 > 135 Nm
Maximum torque of the Suzuki SX4 II is 21 newton meters bigger than the Renault Captur. For this reason, the Suzuki SX4 II will accelerate slightly better and be better for overtaking other vehicles. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also make that the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual will use fever fuel per 100 kilometers.
38

Trunk capacity

431 > 377 l
If you need a vehicles by which you could set of for journeys, which could room more luggage , choose the Suzuki. The Renault is equiped with by 14 percent less capable luggage compartment than the Renault so in this case you would be able to put in the trunk one small parcel less. When it comes to the trunk check its dimensions which have appreciable impact on loading possibility .
33

Top speed

180 > 171 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual is higher in comparison to this of the Renault which allows to travel the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 9 kilometers per hour is small and is imperceptible in everyday driving.
19

Fuel tank

50 > 46 l
The Renault gives way to the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual in the field of fuel tank size. The Suzuki is able to store by 9 % more fuel in comparison to its competitor.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,587 > 899 cc
The Suzuki SX4 II has 77 % larger engine displacement than the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. The difference is large. Consequently the Suzuki should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher top speed. On the other hand greater engine displacement equals worst fuel consumption.
8

Maximum load capacity

645 > 557 kg
6

Length

4,295 > 4,122 mm
The Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual is 173 millimeters longer than the Renault Captur. Long cars have more interior space and also have more storage space. While the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual seems to be better option for families or drivers who appreciate convenient rides, the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual may appeal to women because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
1

Height

1,574 > 1,566 mm
If you are a tall man or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual, which is by 8 mm higher than the Renault Captur, would be better pick for you. However, presented cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much noticeable.
0

Payload

1,735 > 1,662 kg
0

Front track

1,538 > 1,529 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12

Cars specifications

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 1,662 kg 1,735 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK