Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 vs Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4

Source: Rudolf Stricker Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic

18 reasons for

Toyota RAV4 III, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 2.0 i 16V 152HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

8 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy TCe 90HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

18 reasons for Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual

Reasons for

Maximal power

152 > 90 hp
The Toyota RAV4 III comes with petrol which delivers by 62 more horsepower than the Renault Captur, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It seems to be googd car to those who want to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.6 > 12.9 s
A small difference amounts to 18 % indicates that the Renault is insignificantly beaten in this confrontation. In the „small off-road 4x4” class, to which the Renault Captur is assigned, the average acceleration is 10.9 s and is by 18 percent faster than acceleration of Renault’s vehicle.

Trunk capacity

586 > 377 l
The Toyota RAV4 III features 209 liters bigger luggage compartment than the Renault Captur. Such a difference is relevant so it will affect the comfort of the car’s usage. It is worth to note that the Toyota RAV4 III has 32 % bigger trunk capacity than the average in the same class. Bigger trunk will be useful during family journeys and also while daily car’s usage.

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,468 > 453 l

Top speed

185 > 171 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Toyota RAV4 III is greater than the Renault Captur by 14 kilometers per hour, which allows the Toyota RAV4 III to travel quicker large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 14 kilometers/hour is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.


1,819 > 1,778 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects room in the cabin and also stability on road. The Toyota is widther only by 2 percent compared with the Renault and is not really relevant. The average for the „mini 4x4” segment amounts to approximately 1,797 millimeters and is by 22 mm smaller than the same feature of the Toyota RAV4 III.

Fuel tank

61 > 46 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank size is Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 that is able to take by 33 percent more gasoline compared with the Renault Captur.


4 > 3

Engine capacity

1,998 > 899 cc
The Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 has 1,099 cc bigger engine displacement when compared to the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual. Such a substantial difference causes that comparision of this parameters is aimless. The Renault Captur seems to be the right choice for those who apreciate lower fuel consumption and vehicle running costs at the expense of car’s performance, however, drivers the Toyota RAV4 III would take adventage of better power, flexibility, smoothness of the car and consequently better fun from driving.

Maximum load capacity

605 > 557 kg


4,395 > 4,122 mm
The Toyota is 273 mm longer in comparison to the Renault Captur. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Toyota RAV4 III probably will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Toyota RAV4 III will be better driven but the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual will be a little easier for parking due to shorter length of the body.

Rear track

1,559 > 1,514 mm


1,721 > 1,566 mm
If you are a tall man or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Toyota, which is by 10 % higher than the Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual, would be better option for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much in its height and it should not be much noticeable.

Tire width

215 > 205 mm


2,069 > 1,662 kg

Front track

1,560 > 1,529 mm


16 > 12

Curb weight

1,465 > 1,100 kg


8 reasons for Renault Captur Energy TCe 90KM manual in comparison to Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4

Reasons for

Average consumption

5.1 > 8.6 l
The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual consumes 41 percent less amount of fuel in the mixed cycle in comparison to the Toyota. The difference in the amount of 41 percent will be realy noticeable in day-to-day usage of the car. In the long period of time it would give a substantial cost reduction.

Urban consumption

6 > 11 l
The Renault uses 5 l of gasoline fewer while driving inside city in comparison to the Toyota RAV4 III. The Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual, which comes from small off-road 4x4 segment, burns up 3.6 l fewer petrol, which constitutes by 37 percent better result in comparison to the average in its class. The difference in fuel economy between these two cars is really significant, so note that in order to the the comparison was adequate, you should check vehicles with similar parameters.


918 > 698 km


2,601 > 2,556 mm
The wheelbase of a vehicle means the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase notably affects the driving due to more desirable car's weight distribution. Renault Captur has 2 % longer wheelbase distance when compared to Toyota RAV4 III. Wheelbase dimensions are crucial to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Renault Captur should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.

Urban range

750 > 545 km

Model release date

2013 > 2006
Manufacture of the older car began much more earlier than Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 thus we may expect that this car has not so modern parts applied.

Maximal power RPM

5,250 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Tire profile

60 > 70 %

Cars specifications

Toyota RAV4 III 2.0 i 16V 152HP manual 4x4 Renault Captur Energy TCe 90HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2006 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload 2,069 kg 1,662 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK