Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Subaru Forester IV, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 XT 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

9 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has Energy dCi 90HP diesel engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual
Subaru

22 reasons for Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 90 hp
The Subaru has by 150 horsepowers bigger amount of horses under the hood compared to the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. The superiority is colossal and because of this it profoundly affect joy of driving the vehicle. It may be interesting to know that the Subaru Forester IV has by 57 % more horsepower in relation to the average in class „mini 4x4”.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 220 Nm
The Subaru Forester IV has 59 percent more torque than the Renault Captur. Even though the vast majority of drivers do not appreciate the maximum torque when choosing a automobile, it describes the best how a car is speeding up. In this case the difference is substantial and for that reason the Subaru will give you better sensation of driving.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.5 > 13.1 s
If a fast driving is what you are really in to, the Subaru is better for you as it’s acceleration to 100 km/h is 5.6 s faster in comparison to the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual.
38

Trunk capacity

505 > 377 l
With more trunk space the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will have much more room for transporting things and be more functional vehicle compared with the Renault. If the capacity of the boot is important to you, the Subaru Forester IV will be better choice because it is about 34 percent more spacious than the trunk of its competitor.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,579 > 453 l
33

Top speed

221 > 171 km/h
The Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual has 29 percent smaller maximum speed compared to the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4, thanks to which covering a long distance, assuming that it is straight and there is no speed limits, will take much more time. The difference may be perceptible during riding on on the road without speed limits to the vehicle of Subaru brand advantage.
22

Width

1,795 > 1,778 mm
Distance between two sides of a car influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The Subaru Forester IV is widther only by 1 % in comparison to the Renault and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” segment equals to approximately 1,797 mm and is by 2 millimeters smaller than the same attribute of the Subaru.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 46 l
In this category it is the Subaru Forester IV that can carry 15 liters more fuel compared with the Renault Captur. The medium fuel container capacity in the small off-road 4x4 class, which is represented by the Subaru Forester IV, amounts to 61 liters, whereas in mini 4x4 class (represented by the Renault Captur) it equals 61 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,634 > 2,601 mm
The Subaru has 33 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Renault. As a result the Subaru is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable traveling.
8

Engine capacity

1,999 > 1,462 cc
The Subaru Forester IV has 537 cc greater engine size than the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual. The difference is big. Consequently the Subaru should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine capacity usually results in worst fuel economy.
6

Length

4,596 > 4,122 mm
The Subaru Forester IV is 11 % longer in relation to the Renault Captur. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to driving comfort and space in the trunk. The Subaru preasumbly will be offering to it's users more room for legs. At the same time the Subaru will be better driven but the Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual will be a little easier to park due to shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,547 > 1,514 mm
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer installed inside the Subaru is significantly better because it has smaller dimensions and produces less vibrations in comparison to straight engine. Additionally you should keep in mind its horizontal design results in that a vehicle has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of engine which cylinders are arranged in a line, like the one placed inside the Renault, is that due to its simple construction it can be fuel efficient compared to other types of engines.
1

Tire width

225 > 205 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
For drivers who appreciate more convenient use of a vehicle and don’t need complications resulting from the stick shift we recommend vehicles with automatic transmission. For those who enjoy sporting driving a stick shift might be better as it gives a control of rmp range in which a gear is changed.
0

Payload

2,110 > 1,733 kg
0

Front track

1,545 > 1,529 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

16 > 8
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,615 > 1,169 kg

Renault

9 reasons for Renault Captur Energy dCi 90KM manual in comparison to Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

3.8 > 8.3 l
The fuel economy of the Subaru Forester IV is quite low compared with the Renault. The difference at the level of 54 % makes the Renault Captur better choice in terms of high prices of fuel at petrol stations.
56

Urban consumption

4.2 > 11.2 l
The Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual uses of 7 l fuel fewer running around the town compared to the Subaru. The Renault Captur, which is classified in small off-road 4x4 class, burns up 5.4 l of fuel for every 100 km fewer than the medium level in its segment. The average fuel consumption in the “compact SUV” segment equals to 9.6 l per 100 km.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 2,400 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed at which the highest torque is produced indicates how fast an engine achieves its best output with growth in rmp. The lower rmp or the longer range at which the torque is the greatest, the more the engine is flexible and the kick of acceleration should be felt earlier.
24

Extra-urban consumption

3.4 > 7 l
19

Range

1,250 > 706 km
12

Urban range

1,071 > 536 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,324 > 857 km
8

Maximum load capacity

559 > 497 kg
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,600 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 Renault Captur Energy dCi 90HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,996 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK