Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic vs Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual

Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

20 reasons for

Renault Captur, model available from 2013.
It has TCe EDC 120HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic, 6 speed gearbox.

12 reasons for

Renault Megane III Coupe, model available from 2008.
It has 1.6 16v 110HP petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Thomas doerfer Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Renault

20 reasons for Renault Captur TCe EDC 120KM automat in comparison to Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

120 > 110 hp
The horsepower of the Renault is 9 % bigger in comparison to the Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual. Because the difference is small it should not affect the car performance to a large extent.
Add a comment
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 7.1 l
The Renault uses 21 % fewer amount of fuel in the mixed cycle than the Renault. The difference at the level of 1.5 l will be quite significant in day-to-day usage of the vehicle. In the long term it will bring you a real savings.
Add a comment
59

Maximal torque

190 > 151 Nm
Due to 39 newton meters more torque, the engine of the Renault Captur distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual. This, in turn, have positive implications for a car's acceleration.
Add a comment
56

Urban consumption

6.6 > 9.2 l
The Renault Captur consumes 28 percent of fuel less while driving inside city in comparison to the Renault Megane III. The Renault, that comes from mini 4x4 class, uses 3 l fewer petrol, which constitutes by 31 percent lower result than the average in its class. The difference in fuel consumption between these two cars is really big, so remember that so as to the comparison was adequate, you should select cars with similar parameters.
Add a comment
38

Trunk capacity

377 > 346 l
If you are looking for a car for long travels, which could carry more things in the boot , pick the Renault. The Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual is equiped with by 31 l less capable trunk compared with the Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual so probably in this case you would be able to carry one little suitcase less. Examining the trunk pay attention to its width length and height which have substantial effect on loading capability ( Trunk dimensions of Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual - 760 millimeters/510 mm).
Add a comment
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

453 > 375 l
Add a comment
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,000 > 4,250 revolutions/minute
A big difference in rpm at which the maximum torque is generated clearly indicates that the winner is is this of the Renault. The engine of the Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual achieves its full efficiency at 4,250 revolutions per minute which is by 2,250 revolutions per minute lower than the Renault Captur.
Add a comment
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 5.5 l
Add a comment
12

Urban range

682 > 652 km
Add a comment
8

Maximum load capacity

546 > 523 kg
Add a comment
3

Number of doors

5 > 2
Much more comfortable and useful vehicle is 5-door Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic. The 2-door Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual does not really have any advantages, apart from sporty character.
Add a comment
1

Model release date

2013 > 2008
The difference in debut day between presented vehicles is only 5 years, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a staggering pace what may cause that the Renault may have more advanced technologies.
Add a comment
1

Tire width

205 > 195 mm
Add a comment
1

Height

1,566 > 1,421 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Renault Captur, which is by 145 mm higher than the Renault, would be better pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much observable.
Add a comment
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
A stick shift with which the Renault Megane III Coupe is equipped is more simpler built and is cheaper in usage but it is less comfortable as the driver has to operate clutch to shift speeds very often, especialy in a bussy urban traffic where we have lots of stop and go conditions. An automatic transmission put in the Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic with gears in the amount of 6 – speeds transmission is in our opinion better to use.
Add a comment
0

Maximal power RPM

4,900 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
Add a comment
0

Payload

1,730 > 1,728 kg
Add a comment
0

Tire diameter

16 > 15 ″
Add a comment
0

Rear overhang

650 > 797 mm
Add a comment
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %
Add a comment
Renault

12 reasons for Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110KM manual in comparison to Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic

Reasons for
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

10.5 > 10.9 s
The Renault Captur is relatively slower than the Renault Megane III. The difference in the amount of 0.4 s is not really significant and it should not be vitally taken by you into account for selecting the better one of these two cars.
Add a comment
22

Width

1,803 > 1,778 mm
Distance between two sides of a car directly influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual is widther by 1 % compared with the Renault Captur and is not really important. The average for the „lower middle” class is approximately 1,703 millimeters and is by 100 millimeters larger than the width of the Renault.
Add a comment
19

Range

870 > 833 km
Add a comment
19

Fuel tank

61 > 46 l
The Renault loses with the Renault in the aspect of fuel tank capacity. The Renault Megane III Coupe is able to take by 15 liters more fuel than the Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic.
Add a comment
15

Wheelbase

2,646 > 2,601 mm
Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual has 2 % longer wheelbase in comparison to the Renault. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially when driving fast. It also provides more storage space. But, cars having a longer wheelbase are not as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
Add a comment
11

Extra-urban range

1,091 > 957 km
Add a comment
8

Engine capacity

1,599 > 1,198 cc
The Renault Megane III Coupe has 401 cc greater engine displacement in comparison to the Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic. The difference is considerable. For this reason the Renault Megane III Coupe should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity usually means worst fuel economy.
Add a comment
6

Length

4,297 > 4,122 mm
The Renault Megane III Coupe is 175 millimeters longer when compared to the Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic. Long cars are more spacious and in most cases provide bigger trunk. Although the Renault Megane III Coupe seems to be better choice for families or those who appreciate convenient rides, the Renault Captur may be more appropriate to the young as it will not make problems with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
Add a comment
4

Rear track

1,547 > 1,514 mm
Add a comment
0

Front track

1,544 > 1,529 mm
Add a comment
0

Front overhang

861 > 867 mm
Add a comment
0

Curb weight

1,200 > 1,179 kg
Add a comment

Cars specifications

Renault Captur TCe EDC 120HP automatic Renault Megane III Coupe 1.6 16v 110HP manual
    Gross trailer weight - 1,305 kg
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2008
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK