The Renault Clio II comes with petrol which makes by 13 more horsepower than the the engine of the Volkswagen Polo III, giving the vehicle a more dynamic character. It seems to be better car for drivers who want to feel thrill of drive a sports car.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
If a swift driving is what you are really in to, the Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual fits you better as it’s
acceleration from 0 to 100 Km/h is
the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback.
The boot of the Renault Clio II is only 12 l bigger than the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback. However, the difference is so little that it would be right to say that both cars have more of less the same boot space.
Trunk capacity with seats down
The top speed possible to be reached by the Renault is greater compared with of the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback by 15 km/h, which allows the Renault Clio II Hatchback to overcome faster large distance of highway. The difference at the level of 10 percent is little and will be negligible in everyday driving.
Distance between two sides of a car directly affects room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The Renault Clio II is widther only by 4 millimeters in relation to the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „supermini” segment equals to around 1,645 millimeters and is by 9 millimeters bigger than the width of the Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual.
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank capacity is Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual that is able to hold by 9 percent more fuel in relation to the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback.
The wheelbase of a car is the length separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving due to better vehicle's weight distribution. Renault Clio II Hatchback has 68 mm longer wheelbase distance than Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback 1.0 45HP manual. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Hence, the mass of Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
The Renault Clio II Hatchback has 107 cc bigger engine capacity in comparison to the Volkswagen Polo III. For the reason that the difference is small, the Renault Clio II should accelerate only slightly faster, of course if other paramerters are does not play a role.
Maximum load capacity
The Renault is 1 % longer in comparison to the Volkswagen Polo III Hatchback. The length of the vehicle is important in terms of driving comfort and room in the trunk. The Renault Clio II Hatchback preasumbly will be offering to it's passangers more room for legs. Aditionally the Renault Clio II Hatchback 1.1 58HP manual will be better driven ,however, the Volkswagen will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length .
Model release date
Because of the fact that the Volkswagen was unveiled only 4 years prior to the Renault Clio II Hatchback, the gap between technology used in both cars is not really huge, however, the Renault Clio II Hatchback may feature a bit more advanced solutions applied in it.