The horsepower of the Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual is 4 hp grater in comparison to the Suzuki. As the difference is little it should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
A little difference amounts to 1.1 s suggests that the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio is somewhat beaten here. In the „supermini” class, to which the Suzuki is assigned, the average acceleration is 12.9 s and is by 3 sek faster than acceleration of Suzuki’s vehicle.
The boot of the Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual is only 14 l bigger than the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio. However, the difference is so little that it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar trunk size.
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the Rover is greater in relation to this of the Suzuki Swift II by 7, which allows the Rover 100 I to cover faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 7 % is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
The Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual has 13 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Suzuki Swift II. As a result the Rover 100 I is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
The Rover 100 I has by 126 cc bigger engine displacement when compared to the Suzuki Swift II. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both values does not vary much.
Number of doors
In this case a user of the Rover gets an additional door at the back of a car. It will enable him to put luggage into a boot in easier manner, especialy when it comes to things of large size. Passages of both cars who want to seat in the back need to enter a car through a front door which requires folding a front seat.
Model release date
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Rover 100 I may have more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of luggage to it. The difference of 30 mm in favor of the Rover 100 I is small and does not matter much.