Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual vs Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual

Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Alexander Cunningham Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic

13 reasons for

Rover 100 I, model available from 1990 to 1994.
It has 1.1 L 60HP petrol engine produced from 1990 to 1994.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

7 reasons for

Suzuki Swift II Cabrio, model available from 1989 to 1996.
It has 1.0 i 56HP petrol engine produced from 1989 to 1996.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual
Rover

13 reasons for Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

60 > 56 hp
The horsepower of the Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual is 4 hp grater in comparison to the Suzuki. As the difference is little it should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

14.8 > 15.9 s
A little difference amounts to 1.1 s suggests that the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio is somewhat beaten here. In the „supermini” class, to which the Suzuki is assigned, the average acceleration is 12.9 s and is by 3 sek faster than acceleration of Suzuki’s vehicle.
38

Trunk capacity

229 > 215 l
The boot of the Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual is only 14 l bigger than the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio. However, the difference is so little that it would be right to say that both vehicles have similar trunk size.
33

Top speed

155 > 145 km/h
The maximum speed possible to be reached by the ​​Rover is greater in relation to this of the Suzuki Swift II by 7, which allows the Rover 100 I to cover faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 7 % is small and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
15

Wheelbase

2,272 > 2,259 mm
The Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual has 13 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Suzuki Swift II. As a result the Rover 100 I is more safe and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,120 > 994 cc
The Rover 100 I has by 126 cc bigger engine displacement when compared to the Suzuki Swift II. This may have a little impact on vehicle's performance, as both values does not vary much.
3

Number of doors

3 > 2
In this case a user of the Rover gets an additional door at the back of a car. It will enable him to put luggage into a boot in easier manner, especialy when it comes to things of large size. Passages of both cars who want to seat in the back need to enter a car through a front door which requires folding a front seat.
1

Model release date

1990 > 1989
The difference in debut day between presented cars is only 1 year, however, new technologies for vehicles are appearing at a dizzying pace what may cause that the Rover 100 I may have more modern solutionswhich in a consequence may deliver you more joy of having it.
1

Height

1,380 > 1,350 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of luggage to it. The difference of 30 mm in favor of the Rover 100 I is small and does not matter much.
0

Number of seats

5 > 2
0

Valves

8 > 6
0

Tire profile

65 > 70 %

Suzuki

7 reasons for Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56KM manual in comparison to Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.4 > 6 l
The Suzuki Swift II burns up 10 percent less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Rover 100 I. The Suzuki, which is classified in „B” segment burns up by 0.6 l less amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6 l.
22

Width

1,590 > 1,560 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle influences on interior space for travelers and also stability during driving. The Suzuki Swift II is widther by 30 millimeters in relation to the Rover 100 I and is not really relevant. The average for the „B” class equals to around 1,645 millimeters and is by 55 millimeters bigger than the width of the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio.
19

Range

755 > 574 km
19

Fuel tank

40 > 35 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Suzuki Swift II that can hold by 5 l more fuel in relation to the Rover.
6

Length

3,745 > 3,570 mm
The Suzuki is 175 millimeters longer in relation to the Rover 100 I. Long vehicles are more spacious and usually provide plenty of trunk space. While the Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual occurs to be better for families or drivers who appreciate comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual may be more appropriate to city drivers because it will not make troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 5,900 revolutions/minute
0

End of model sale

1996 > 1994

Cars specifications

Rover 100 I 1.1 L 60HP manual Suzuki Swift II Cabrio 1.0 i 56HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 1990 1989
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,290 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK