Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual vs Saab 9-5 III 1.6 Turbo 180HP manual

Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Volvo S60 II Sedan, model available from 2010.
It has 2.4 D5 215HP diesel engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Saab 9-5 III, model available from 2010.
It has 1.6 Turbo 180HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

Saab 9-5 III 1.6 Turbo 180HP manual
Volvo

22 reasons for Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215KM manual in comparison to Saab 9-5 III 1.6 Turbo 180HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

215 > 180 hp
The horsepower of the Volvo is 35 hp bigger when compared to the Saab 9-5 III 1.6 Turbo 180HP manual. Because the difference is not big it should not affect the car performance considerably.
112

Average consumption

4.6 > 7.6 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual's advantage. This car burns 40 percent fewer oil in the combined cycle in relation to the Saab 9-5 III. Note that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the executive segment, in which the Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual is classified, equals to 8.8 l while the Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual consumes by 48 percent less fuel than the average.
59

Maximal torque

420 > 231 Nm
Because of 189 newton meters greater torque, the engine of the Volvo S60 II Sedan distinctly better transmits power to the wheels than the Saab 9-5 III. This, in turn, have a positive impact on a car's acceleration.
56

Urban consumption

5.8 > 10.7 l
The Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual consumes 4.9 l of fuel fewer in the city compared to the Saab 9-5 III. The Volvo, which represents upper middle segment, uses 6.1 l less oil, which constitutes by 51 % better fuel consumption in comparison to the average in the same class. The difference in fuel efficiency between compared vehicles is really big, so remember that in order to the the comparison have a sense, you should choose models of similar parameters.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

7.7 > 9.5 s
The Volvo S60 II can reach the speed of 100Km/h in 7.7 s, which is 19 % better result when compared to the Saab. However the difference is not as much significant to be taken into account when buying a automobile.
33

Top speed

230 > 220 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual is greater compared with this of the Saab 9-5 III by 5, which allows the Volvo S60 II to overcome quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 5 percent is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,500 > 2,200 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower number of revolutions at which the highest torque is produced determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. Still, to eliminate engines drawbacks like e.g. turbo lug, it is worth to check a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.1 > 6.2 l
19

Range

1,426 > 897 km
14

Cylinders

5 > 4
12

Urban range

1,155 > 654 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,634 > 1,148 km
8

Engine capacity

2,401 > 1,599 cc
The Volvo S60 II has 50 % larger engine displacement when compared to the Saab 9-5 III. The difference is large. As a result the Volvo S60 II Sedan should accelerate faster and be able to achieve higher maximum speed. On the other hand larger engine capacity usually equals worst fuel efficiency.
8

Maximum load capacity

520 > 445 kg
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Height

1,483 > 1,465 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Volvo, which is by 1 percent higher than the Saab 9-5 III, is appropriate pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not differ much when it comes to its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 5,500 revolutions/minute
0

Trunk width

1,585 > 1,391 mm
0

Front track

1,588 > 1,585 mm
0

Front overhang

937 > 1,024 mm
0

Valves

20 > 16
0

Rear overhang

914 > 1,149 mm

Saab

10 reasons for Saab 9-5 III 1.6 Turbo 180KM manual in comparison to Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual

Reasons for
38

Trunk capacity

513 > 380 l
With more boot size the Saab 9-5 III will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull one than the Volvo. If the capacity of the boot is appeals to you, the Saab will be better choice because it is around 35 percent larger than the trunk of its rival.
22

Width

1,868 > 1,862 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle directly influences on the amount of space for passengers as well as stability during driving. The width of the Saab is larger by 6 millimeters than the Volvo S60 II and is not really relevant. The medium for the „E” class is 1,826 millimeters and is by 42 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Saab 9-5 III.
19

Fuel tank

69 > 67 l
The winner of these two vehicles in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is Saab 9-5 III 1.6 Turbo 180HP manual which is able to take by 3 % more fuel in relation to the Volvo.
15

Wheelbase

2,844 > 2,771 mm
Saab has 73 millimeters longer wheelbase when compared to the Volvo S60 II. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, cars with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
11

Trunk length with seats up

1,106 > 963 mm
8

Gross trailer weight

1,699 > 1,605 kg
6

Length

5,005 > 4,628 mm
The Saab is 377 millimeters longer in relation to the Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual. Long vehicles are more spacious and in most cases provide plenty of trunk space. Although the Saab 9-5 III occurs to be better choice for families or persons who value comfortable rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Volvo S60 II may be more appropriate to singles as it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
0

Payload

2,168 > 2,091 kg
0

Width with outside mirrors

2,117 > 2,093 mm
0

Curb weight

1,722 > 1,568 kg

Cars specifications

Volvo S60 II Sedan 2.4 D5 215HP manual Saab 9-5 III 1.6 Turbo 180HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,605 kg 1,699 kg
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2010 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class E E
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK