Skoda Octavia III RS Estate 2.0 TSI 220HP manual vs Subaru Impreza II Estate 1.5 i 101HP

Skoda Octavia III RS Estate 2.0 TSI 220HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

9 reasons for

Skoda Octavia III RS Estate, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 TSI 220HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Subaru Impreza II Estate, model available from 2000 to 2008.
It has 1.5 i 101HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2005.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Subaru Impreza II Estate 1.5 i 101HP
Skoda

9 reasons for Skoda Octavia III RS Kombi 2.0 TSI 220KM manual in comparison to Subaru Impreza II Estate 1.5 i 101HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

220 > 101 hp
The Subaru Impreza II Estate significantly gives way to the Skoda Octavia III RS Estate 2.0 TSI 220HP manual in the category of amount of horses under the hood having them by 119 horsepowers less. Consequently the engine installed in the Skoda Octavia III, as opposed to the Subaru Impreza II Estate, has relatively lots of power and good acceleration.
38

Trunk capacity

610 > 353 l
With more boot size the Skoda Octavia III will have much more room for carrying things and be more usefull car compared with the Subaru Impreza II Estate. If the capacity of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Skoda Octavia III will be better to buy because it is around 73 percent more spacious than the trunk of its rival.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,739 > 1,264 l
22

Width

1,817 > 1,695 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Skoda Octavia III RS Estate 2.0 TSI 220HP manual is 122 mm wider in relation to the Subaru Impreza II Estate 1.5 i 101HP. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,678 > 2,525 mm
Skoda Octavia III has 6 percent longer wheelbase in relation to the Subaru Impreza II Estate 1.5 i 101HP. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
6

Length

4,686 > 4,415 mm
The Skoda is 6 percent longer when compared to the Subaru Impreza II Estate 1.5 i 101HP. The length of the car is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Skoda probably will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Skoda Octavia III RS Estate 2.0 TSI 220HP manual will be better driven ,however, the Subaru will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,509 > 1,455 mm
1

Model release date

2013 > 2000
0

Front track

1,534 > 1,465 mm

Subaru

2 reasons for Subaru Impreza II Kombi 1.5 i 101KM in comparison to Skoda Octavia III RS Estate 2.0 TSI 220HP manual

Reasons for
19

Fuel tank

51 > 50 l
In this category it is the Subaru that can hold 2 percent more fuel in comparison to the Skoda Octavia III RS Estate. The average fuel tank size in the C segment, which is represented by the Subaru Impreza II Estate, amounts to 52 liters, whereas in compact class (represented by the Skoda Octavia III) it equals 52 liters.
1

Height

1,465 > 1,450 mm
If you are a tall man or you happen to carry in the trunk thinks of big dimensions, the Subaru Impreza II Estate 1.5 i 101HP, which is by 1 percent higher than the Skoda Octavia III RS Estate 2.0 TSI 220HP manual, would be better option for you. However, presented cars do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.

Cars specifications

Skoda Octavia III RS Estate 2.0 TSI 220HP manual Subaru Impreza II Estate 1.5 i 101HP
    Gross trailer weight 1,795 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2000
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK