Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual vs Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual

Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org IFCAR All Rights Released into the public domain

19 reasons for

Toyota Sequoia I, model available from 2001 to 2007.
It has 4.7 V8 32V 243HP petrol engine produced from 2001 to 2005.
Drive on the rear axle has manual gearbox.

4 reasons for

Ssangyong Rexton I, model available from 2002 to 2007.
It has 2.3 RX 140HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2007.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual
Toyota

19 reasons for Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243KM manual in comparison to Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

243 > 140 hp
The horsepower is a this thing that most of car fans look at first when buying a car. In this comparison it is the Toyota Sequoia I that has by 74 percent more horsepower in comparison to the Ssangyong Rexton I. Therefore the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual is able to achieve higher speed. Due to more horsepower the Toyota will as well provide better flexiblility in specific gears.
38

Trunk capacity

785 > 501 l
With more trunk space the Toyota will have much more room for loading things and be more usefull car than the Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual. If the capacity of the boot is what does appeal to you, the Toyota Sequoia I will be better to buy as it is about 57 percent larger than the boot of the Ssangyong.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

2,301 > 1,921 l
33

Top speed

175 > 170 km/h
The top speed possible to be reached by the Toyota is higher as compared to this of the Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual which allows to cover the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference at the level of 3 % is not big and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
22

Width

2,032 > 1,880 mm
Width of a vehicle directly affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability while driving. The width of the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual is larger only by 8 % in relation to the Ssangyong Rexton I and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „full-size SUV” class equals to around 1,866 mm and is by 166 millimeters smaller than the same feature of the Toyota Sequoia I.
19

Fuel tank

100 > 80 l
In the aspect of fuel tank size it is the Toyota Sequoia I which can carry 20 l more fuel compared with the Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual. The medium fuel container size in the large SUV segment, which is represented by the Toyota, amounts to 84 liters, whereas in large 4x4 class (represented by the Ssangyong Rexton I) it equals 84 l.
15

Wheelbase

3,102 > 2,838 mm
Toyota Sequoia I has 264 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Ssangyong Rexton I. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
14

Cylinders

8 > 4
8

Engine capacity

4,664 > 2,294 cc
The Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual has 2,370 cc bigger engine capacity in comparison to the Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual. Such a huge difference makes that comparision of this characteristics have little sense. The Ssangyong Rexton I would be the good choice for those who apreciate lower fuel consumption and vehicle running costs at the expense of slower driving, however, those who decided to buy the Toyota Sequoia I would benefit from grater power, durability, culture of the car and as a result better joy from driving.
6

Length

5,209 > 4,729 mm
The Toyota is 10 % longer than the Ssangyong. Long vehicles have more interior space and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual seems to be better pick for families or those who value comfortable rides, the Ssangyong Rexton I may appeal to city drivers as it will not make problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,752 > 1,540 mm
4

Cylinder layout

V-type > inline
A V engine is a improved construction of a In-line engine which in our opinion} is {a better one. Engine of V characteristic installed inside a the Toyota Sequoia I produces more torque at lower RPM ranges due to the power stroke coming from 2 sides of the crankshaft. This type of motor can contain more cylinders without a need of much extending its dimensions. A Better engine work and thrilling sound is to a Vee engine’s advantage.
1

Height

1,956 > 1,770 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater capacity of loading big amount of thinks to it. The difference at the level of 186 mm in favor of the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual is small and should not be really noticeable.
1

Tire width

245 > 235 mm
0

Maximal power RPM

4,800 > 5,250 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,945 > 2,550 kg
0

Front track

1,726 > 1,550 mm
0

Valves

32 > 16
0

Curb weight

2,298 > 1,816 kg

Ssangyong

4 reasons for Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140KM manual in comparison to Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

15.8 > 23 l
The fuel economy (urban) is considerably to the Ssangyong Rexton I's advantage. This vehicle burns 7.2 l fewer gasoline running around the town in comparison to the Toyota. Better fuel econumy means less fuel cost passed on you.
12

Urban range

506 > 430 km
8

Maximum load capacity

735 > 650 kg
1

Model release date

2002 > 2001
Because of the fact that the Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual's production began only 1 year earlier than the Ssangyong Rexton I, the distance in technology applied in both cars is not really big, however, the Ssangyong might have a bit more new solutions used in it.

Cars specifications

Toyota Sequoia I 4.7 V8 32V 243HP manual Ssangyong Rexton I 2.3 RX 140HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2001 2002
    Facelifting no no
    Class full-size SUV full-size SUV
    Payload 2,945 kg 2,550 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK