Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4 vs UAZ 469 2.4 98HP

Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

8 reasons for

Subaru Forester II, model available from 2002 to 2008.
It has 2.0 X 125HP petrol engine produced from 2002 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

5 reasons for

UAZ 469, model available from 1972 to 1988.
It has 2.4 98HP petrol engine produced from 1980 to 1988.
Drive has manual gearbox.

UAZ 469 2.4 98HP
Subaru

8 reasons for Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125KM manual 4x4 in comparison to UAZ 469 2.4 98HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

125 > 98 hp
The Subaru comes with petrol which makes by 28 % more horsepower than the UAZ, giving the vehicle a much more sporty character. It seems to be googd choice for drivers who would like to feel thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
15

Wheelbase

2,534 > 2,377 mm
The wheelbase of a car is the distance separating its front and rear wheels. The wheelbase significantly affects the driving because of better vehicle's weight distribution. Subaru Forester II has 157 millimeters longer wheelbase distance in relation to UAZ 469. Wheelbase dimensions are important to the balance and steering. Thus, the mass of Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4 should be better distributed and driving should be smoother and safer.
6

Length

4,484 > 4,025 mm
The Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4 is 11 percent longer when compared to the UAZ 469 2.4 98HP. The length of the car is significant in terms of travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Subaru Forester II preasumbly will be offering to it's users more space for legs. At the same time the Subaru will be better driven but the UAZ 469 2.4 98HP will be a bit easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,485 > 1,453 mm
3

Price range

popular > trucks
1

Model release date

2002 > 1972
0

Front track

1,495 > 1,453 mm
0

End of model sale

2008 > 1988

UAZ

5 reasons for UAZ 469 2.4 98KM in comparison to Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
22

Width

1,785 > 1,735 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The UAZ 469 is 3 percent wider in comparison to the Subaru Forester II. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

79 > 61 l
The winner of selected cars in the aspect of fuel tank capacity is UAZ 469 which can take by 30 percent more petrol in relation to the Subaru Forester II.
9

Ground clearance

299 > 199 mm
Ground clearance is defined as the space between the vehicle body and the road. When it comes to the two compared cars, it is the UAZ 469 which has 100 mm higher ground clearance than the Subaru Forester II. This is why the UAZ 469 will cope better with rough terrain and high curbs in the city. One drawback is the higher ride height means a higher center of gravity, which can negatively influence the handling of the UAZ 469 2.4 98HP.
1

Height

2,044 > 1,590 mm
The UAZ is by 29 percent higher when compared to the Subaru Forester II. As a result the UAZ 469 is better for getting in and out of the it, especially for older relatives and gives impression of more safety because of siting high behind the wheel. This also guarantees good visibility . The UAZ 469 is certainly more convenient for families but it is not recommended for drivers that are looking for dynamic driving and sporting emotions.
0

Number of seats

7 > 5

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester II 2.0 X 125HP manual 4x4 UAZ 469 2.4 98HP
    Price range popular trucks
    Model release date 2002 1972
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    End of model sale 2008 1988

Compare with other cars

By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK