Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 vs Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

21 reasons for

Subaru Forester IV, model available from 2013.
It has 2.0 XT 240HP ic petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive 4x4 has automatic gearbox.

7 reasons for

Suzuki SX4 II, model available from 2013.
It has 1.6 VVT 120HP petrol engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
Subaru

21 reasons for Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240KM automat 4x4 in comparison to Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

240 > 120 hp
The Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual distinctly gives way to the Subaru in the category of horsepower having them by 100 % less. As a result the engine installed in the Subaru Forester IV has lots of power and rapid acceleration.
59

Maximal torque

350 > 156 Nm
The difference at the level of 124 percent is really huge thanks to which the Subaru Forester IV features much more better flexibility of the engine, it reaches high speed much more faster and has better towing power.
38

Trunk capacity

505 > 431 l
The boot of the Subaru Forester IV is only 17 percent bigger than the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. However, the difference is not significant and it would be right to say that both cars have more of less the same trunk space.
33

Top speed

221 > 180 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Subaru Forester IV is greater in relation to of the Suzuki SX4 II by 41 km/h, which allows the Subaru Forester IV to travel quicker long stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 23 percent is small and will be negligible in everyday driving.
30

Maximal torque RPM

2,400 > 4,400 revolutions/minute
The rotational speed where the highest torque is reached determines how fast an engine reaches its best efficiency with increase in rotational speed. The lower rmp or the wider range at which the torque has the highest value, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.
22

Width

1,795 > 1,762 mm
Distance between two sides of a car affects room in the cabin and also stability on road. The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 is widther by 33 mm than the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual and is not really worth considering. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” segment is approximately 1,797 mm and is by 2 mm smaller than the same attribute of the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4.
19

Fuel tank

61 > 50 l
The winner of this confrontatnion in the aspect of fuel tank size is Subaru Forester IV which can take by 11 l more fuel compared with the Suzuki SX4 II.
15

Wheelbase

2,634 > 2,595 mm
The Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 has 39 mm longer wheelbase in comparison to Suzuki SX4 II. As a result the Subaru is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable driving.
9

Ground clearance

220 > 172 mm
Ground clearance means the gap between the car underbody and the ground. As for these two cars, it is the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 that has 48 mm higher ride height than the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. For this reason the Subaru Forester IV will deal better with dirt roads and high curbs in the city. One drawback is the higher ground clearance equals a higher center of gravity, which can adversely affect the handling of the vehicle.
8

Engine capacity

1,999 > 1,587 cc
The engine cubic capacity of the Subaru is by 26 % larger than the Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual. In a consequence the Suzuki will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 will be of better performance, running more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,596 > 4,295 mm
The Subaru Forester IV is 7 percent longer than the Suzuki SX4 II. Long cars are more spacious and usually provide more storage space. While the Subaru Forester IV seems to be better choice for families or drivers who value soft, smooth long-distance driving, the Suzuki SX4 II may appeal to singles because it will not cause problems with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
4

Rear track

1,547 > 1,505 mm
4

Cylinder layout

boxer > inline
A Boxer engine put in the Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 occurs to be distinctly better because it is smaller and produces less vibrations in relation to engine with cylinders arranged in a straight line. What is more it is good to know that its horizontally opposed configuration causes that a car has the benefit of a lower center of gravity what affects the better grip. The advantage of In-line engine, like the one placed in the Suzuki, is that due to its simplicity of construction it can be cheaper compared to other types of engines.
1

Tire width

225 > 205 mm
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox in the Subaru in spite of having a few disadvantages gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel you probably would be less exhausted. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine because of the factory settings of shifts in specific revs range.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,600 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Payload

2,110 > 1,735 kg
0

Front track

1,545 > 1,538 mm
0

Tire diameter

18 > 16 ″
0

Tire profile

55 > 60 %
0

Curb weight

1,615 > 1,090 kg

Suzuki

7 reasons for Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120KM manual in comparison to Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.6 > 8.3 l
The fuel economy is considerably to Suzuki's advantage. This car burns 2.7 l fewer gasoline in the combined cycle compared to the Subaru. Bear in mind that average fuel consumption in the combined cycle for the small off-road 4x4 segment, in which the Suzuki SX4 II is classified, equals to 7.5 l while the Suzuki consumes by 25 percent less fuel than the average.
56

Urban consumption

6.8 > 11.2 l
The fuel consumption while driving inside city is considerably to the Suzuki's advantage. This automobile burns 39 % fewer gasoline in the urban cycle when compared to the Subaru. Better fuel econumy equals an increase in cruising range.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.7 > 7 l
19

Range

909 > 706 km
12

Urban range

735 > 536 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,042 > 857 km
8

Maximum load capacity

645 > 497 kg

Cars specifications

Subaru Forester IV 2.0 XT 240HP automatic 4x4 Suzuki SX4 II 1.6 VVT 120HP manual
    Gross trailer weight 1,996 kg -
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2013 2013
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK