Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic vs Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

22 reasons for

Volvo XC60 SUV, model available from 2008.
It has 2.0 T 203HP ic petrol engine produced from 2010 to 2013.
Drive has automatic gearbox.

4 reasons for

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV, model available from 2005.
It has 1.6 i 16V 106HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2008.
Drive 4x4 has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
Volvo

22 reasons for Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203KM automat in comparison to Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

203 > 106 hp
The Volvo XC60 SUV has by 92 % more horsepower compared to Suzuki. The Volvo will be distinctly better accelerate thanks to bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing other cars should be a piece of cake for the Volvo equipped with more powerful motor.
59

Maximal torque

320 > 145 Nm
When you step on the gas pedal and you start speeding up fast, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better driving the Volvo because it has by 175 Nm more torque in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. Presented vehicles differ so much that only riding the Volvo XC60 SUV you will experience a pleasurable sensations of getting pushed back in the seat as it starts to accelerate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

8.9 > 14.4 s
The Volvo XC60 speeds up to 100k\h by 5.5 s faster in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. A noticable difference in acceleration in favor of the Volvo will allow him to overtake much faster and avoid other obstacles.
38

Trunk capacity

495 > 186 l
The boot of the Volvo XC60 is 309 l more spacious compared to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic will be a way more functional. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can carry.
33

Top speed

205 > 160 km/h
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II has by 28 % smaller maximum velocity compared to the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic, because of which passing a long route, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, will last much longer. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on fast and long routes to the vehicle of Volvo brand advantage.
30

Maximal torque RPM

1,750 > 4,100 revolutions/minute
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is generated clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is this of the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic. The engine of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 reaches its full efficiency at 4,100 revolutions per minute which is by 57 % lower than the Volvo XC60.
24

Extra-urban consumption

6.9 > 7 l
22

Width

1,889 > 1,810 mm
distance between left and right side of a car influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Volvo XC60 is larger only by 79 mm in relation to the Suzuki and is not really important. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” class amounts to 1,797 millimeters and is by 5 percent larger than the width of the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic.
19

Range

824 > 671 km
19

Fuel tank

70 > 55 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank capacity is Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic which can take by 15 liters more fuel in comparison to the Suzuki.
15

Wheelbase

2,775 > 2,636 mm
The Volvo XC60 has 5 % longer wheelbase when compared to Suzuki. Thanks to this the Volvo XC60 SUV is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
12

Urban range

619 > 539 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,014 > 775 km
8

Engine capacity

2,000 > 1,587 cc
The engine capacity of the Volvo XC60 is by 413 cubic centimeters bigger than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. In a consequence the Suzuki will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Volvo XC60 SUV will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
6

Length

4,629 > 4,467 mm
The Volvo XC60 SUV is 4 % longer in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. Long cars have more interior space and also provide more storage space. While the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic seems to be better for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Suzuki Grand Vitara II may appeal to singles as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
4

Rear track

1,586 > 1,570 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
1

Model release date

2008 > 2005
Because of the fact that the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 started to be manufactured only 3 years before the Volvo, the distance in technology used in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Volvo XC60 SUV might feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,714 > 1,695 mm
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference at the level of 1 percent to the advantage of the Volvo XC60 is not big and should not be really noticeable.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox which is installed in the Volvo despite having a few disadvantages offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel you probably would be more rested. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.
0

Front track

1,635 > 1,540 mm
0

Rear overhang

942 > 1,074 mm

Suzuki

4 reasons for Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106KM manual 4x4 in comparison to Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

8.3 > 8.4 l
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV uses 0.1 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic. The Suzuki Grand Vitara II, which is palced in „compact SUV” class uses by 0.8 l more amount of fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle is 7.5 l.
56

Urban consumption

10.2 > 11.3 l
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II uses 10 % less fuel in urban cycle than the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic. The difference at the level of 1.1 l is quite big in daily use of car. Additionally, within many months it will generate real and noticeable cost savings. Also note that medium results of the average fuel consumption can be considerably increased if you ride swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so huge that you should consider to choose cars with similar engines. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,900 > 6,000 revolutions/minute
0

Front overhang

753 > 911 mm

Cars specifications

Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4
    Price range luxury popular
    Model release date 2008 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class compact SUV compact SUV
    Payload - 1,828 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK