The Volvo XC60 SUV has by 92 % more horsepower compared to Suzuki. The Volvo will be distinctly better accelerate thanks to bigger amout of horses under its hoot. Also maneuvers like overtaking and passing other cars should be a piece of cake for the Volvo equipped with more powerful motor.
When you step on the gas pedal and you start speeding up fast, that’s torque you’re feeling. And you will experience it better driving the Volvo because it has by 175 Nm more torque in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. Presented vehicles differ so much that only riding the Volvo XC60 SUV you will experience a pleasurable sensations of getting pushed back in the seat as it starts to accelerate.
Acceleration 0-100 km/h
The Volvo XC60 speeds up to 100k\h by
faster in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. A noticable difference in
acceleration in favor of the Volvo will allow him to overtake much
faster and avoid other obstacles.
The boot of the Volvo XC60 is 309 l more spacious compared to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. It is perceptible difference so, in this category the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic will be a way more functional. The larger the trunk, the more baggage you can carry.
The Suzuki Grand Vitara II has by 28 % smaller maximum velocity compared to the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic, because of which passing a long route, for example when it is straight and there is no speed limits, will last much longer. The difference might be noticeable during travelling on fast and long routes to the vehicle of Volvo brand advantage.
Maximal torque RPM
A big difference in revolutions per minute at which the maximum torque is generated clearly shows that a car which does not require to be revved high is this of the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic. The engine of the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 reaches its full efficiency at 4,100 revolutions per minute which is by 57 % lower than the Volvo XC60.
distance between left and right side of a car influences on room in the cabin as well as stability on road. The width of the Volvo XC60 is larger only by 79 mm in relation to the Suzuki and is not really important. The medium for the „small off-road 4x4” class amounts to 1,797 millimeters and is by 5 percent larger than the width of the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic.
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank capacity is Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic which can take by 15 liters more fuel in comparison to the Suzuki.
The Volvo XC60 has 5 % longer wheelbase when compared to Suzuki. Thanks to this the Volvo XC60 SUV is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
The engine capacity of the Volvo XC60 is by 413 cubic centimeters bigger than the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4. In a consequence the Suzuki will be more fuel efficient, but, the engine of the Volvo XC60 SUV will be of better performance, working more smoothly and more durable.
The Volvo XC60 SUV is 4 % longer in comparison to the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV. Long cars have more interior space and also provide more storage space. While the Volvo XC60 SUV 2.0 T 203HP automatic seems to be better for families or those who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Suzuki Grand Vitara II may appeal to singles as it will not cause troubles with parking and will have smaller turning radius.
Model release date
Because of the fact that the Suzuki Grand Vitara II SUV 1.6 i 16V 106HP manual 4x4 started to be manufactured only 3 years before the Volvo, the distance in technology used in both vehicles is not really huge, however, the Volvo XC60 SUV might feature a bit more new solutions used in it.
The higher a car is, the better is the comfort of getting in to it and greater capacity of loading big amount of luggage to it. The difference at the level of 1 percent to the advantage of the Volvo XC60 is not big and should not be really noticeable.
Automatic gearbox which is installed in the Volvo despite having a few disadvantages offers much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel you probably would be more rested. Moreover automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.