Suzuki Splash Hatchback 1.0 65HP manual vs Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual

Suzuki Splash Hatchback 1.0 65HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Xavigivax Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

21 reasons for

Suzuki Splash Hatchback, model available from 2008.
It has 1.0 65HP petrol engine produced from 2008 to 2012.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

4 reasons for

Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d, model available from 2005.
It has 1.4 D-4D 55HP diesel engine produced from 2005 to 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual
Suzuki

21 reasons for Suzuki Splash Hatchback 1.0 65KM manual in comparison to Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

65 > 55 hp
The horsepower is a feature that majority of drivers pay the biggest attention to. In this case, it is the Suzuki which has by 18 percent horsepower more when compared to the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d, which makes this vehicle somewhat better in terms of high speed. Thanks to more horsepower the Suzuki Splash will also give a bit more efficiency in specific speeds.
38

Trunk capacity

176 > 139 l
With more trunk space the Suzuki will have much more room for carrying things and be more functional car compared with the Toyota Aygo. If the capacity of the trunk is what does appeal to you, the Suzuki will be better choice because it is about 27 % larger than the boot of its contender.
33

Top speed

160 > 154 km/h
The top speed of the ​​Suzuki Splash is greater than this of the Toyota by 4, which allows the Suzuki Splash to overcome faster long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 6 kilometers/hour is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,678 > 1,619 mm
The width of the vehicle influences directly on passanger's inner room and driving stability. The Suzuki Splash is 59 mm wider in comparison to the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual. It is often clearly perceptible by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

45 > 36 l
The Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual loses with the Suzuki Splash Hatchback 1.0 65HP manual in the aspect of fuel tank size. The Suzuki Splash Hatchback is able to take by 9 l more fuel than its competitor.
15

Wheelbase

2,363 > 2,348 mm
The Suzuki Splash has 1 % longer wheelbase when compared to Toyota. Therefore the Suzuki Splash Hatchback is more safe and has a better stability. Besides, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
12

Urban range

726 > 636 km
8

Maximum load capacity

510 > 355 kg
6

Length

3,716 > 3,416 mm
The Suzuki Splash Hatchback 1.0 65HP manual is 300 millimeters longer in comparison to the Toyota. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the boot. The Suzuki very likely will be offering to it's passangers more space for legs. Aditionally the Suzuki Splash will be better driven ,however, the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d will be a slightly easier for parking because of shorter length of the body.
4

Rear track

1,480 > 1,407 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Suzuki Splash Hatchback is more convenient and if you regularly travel with more than one passenger then you should not have any doubts which one to choose. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the rear seats but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the car when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual generally look much cooler and for young drivers who don’t often have passengers in the back seat the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual may be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Model release date

2008 > 2005
Given that the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual debuted only 3 years earlier than the Suzuki, the gap between technology used in both cars shouldn’t be really huge, however, the Suzuki Splash Hatchback 1.0 65HP manual may have slightly more modern solutions used in it.
1

Height

1,592 > 1,465 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of big size, the Suzuki Splash, which is by 9 % higher than the Toyota Aygo, is appropriate option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much when it comes to its height and it should not be much noticeable.
1

Tire width

185 > 155 mm
0

Payload

1,486 > 1,242 kg
0

Front track

1,470 > 1,414 mm
0

Valves per cylinder

4 > 2
0

Valves

12 > 8
0

Tire diameter

15 > 14 ″
0

Tire profile

60 > 65 %
0

Curb weight

973 > 894 kg

Toyota

4 reasons for Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Splash Hatchback 1.0 65HP manual

Reasons for
56

Urban consumption

5.5 > 6.2 l
The Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual uses 11 % less fuel in city traffic compared with the Suzuki. The difference at the level of 11 % will be quite significant in daily use of vehicle. Additionally, during years it will generate real and noticeable cost savings. Also bear in mind that presented results of the average fuel consumption may be considerably increased if you drive dynamically. The difference in fuel consumption of the cars selected by you is so tremendous that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,453 > 997 cc
The Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d has 456 cc bigger engine size in comparison to the Suzuki Splash Hatchback. The difference is considerable. Consequently the Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d should accelerate faster and be able to reach higher maximum speed. On the other hand greater engine capacity usually means worst fuel economy.
0

Maximal power RPM

4,000 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Suzuki Splash Hatchback 1.0 65HP manual Toyota Aygo Hatchback 3d 1.4 D-4D 55HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2008 2005
    Facelifting no no
    Class A A
    Payload 1,486 kg 1,242 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK