Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual vs Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual

Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org OSX All Rights Released into the public domain

17 reasons for

Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d, model available from 2005 to 2011.
It has 1.0 VVT-i 69HP petrol engine produced from 2005 to 2011.
Drive has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

2 reasons for

Suzuki Swift III Hatchback, model available from 1996 to 2004.
It has 1.0 i 53HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual
Toyota

17 reasons for Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

69 > 53 hp
The Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual has 16 horsepowers more horsepower than Suzuki. The Toyota Yaris II will be distinctly better speed up because of bigger horsepower. Also overtaking obstacles like TIRs or buses while moving along the road should be much more easier for a car equipped with stronger motor.
59

Maximal torque

91 > 76 Nm
The Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual has 15 newton meters more torque in relation to the Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual. Even though most of drivers do not attach importance the maximum torque when buying a vehicle, it describes the best how a vehicle is speeding up. As far as these two vehicles are concerned the difference is little and for that reason you probably will not feel the difference.
56

Urban consumption

6 > 6.9 l
The Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual burns up 0.9 l less fuel in urban cycle compared with the Suzuki Swift III. The difference at the level of 13 % is quite big in daily using car. Additionally, within years it may bring real and noticeable cost savings. Moreover bear in mind that medium results of the average fuel efficiency might be considerably increased if you ride swiftly. The difference in fuel economy of the vehicles compared by you is so big that you should consider to choose cars with engines of similar power and similar dimensions. Only then will the comparision be adequate.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

15.7 > 16 s
The Suzuki Swift III Hatchback speeds up relatively slower compared to the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d. The difference in the amount of 0.3 s is quite little and it should not be strongly taken into account when choosing one of presented cars.
33

Top speed

155 > 145 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Toyota is greater as compared to this of the Suzuki which allows to drive the same distance on the highway in shorter period of time. The difference that amounts to 7 percent is little and is not realy noticable in everyday use.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.5 > 4.6 l
22

Width

1,691 > 1,580 mm
The width of the vehicle influences on passanger's inner room as well as driving stability. The Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d is 7 % wider than the Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more room for their elbows.
19

Fuel tank

43 > 40 l
In terms of capacity of a fuel tank it is the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual that can comprise 8 percent more fuel than the Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual. The average fuel container capacity in the small cars class, from which the Toyota Yaris II comes from, equals 44 l, whereas in supermini class (represented by the Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual) it equals 44 l.
15

Wheelbase

2,461 > 2,268 mm
The Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d has 193 mm longer wheelbase when compared to Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual. Consequently the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual is safer and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase affects convenient and more comfortable driving.
12

Urban range

700 > 580 km
11

Extra-urban range

933 > 851 km
8

Engine capacity

998 > 994 cc
The Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual has by 4 cc bigger engine size when compared to the Suzuki Swift III Hatchback. This play a little role on vehicle's performance, as both figures does not differ much.
6

Length

3,750 > 3,721 mm
The Toyota Yaris II is 1 % longer in comparison to the Suzuki. The length of the car plays a role when it comes to travelling comfort and space in the trunk. The Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual very likely will be offering to it's users more space for legs. Aditionally the Toyota Yaris II will be better driven ,however, the Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual will be a bit easier to park because of shorter length of the body.
1

Model release date

2005 > 1996
Manufacture of the older car started much more earlier than its contender and for this reason it seems to be right to assume that this car is equipped with significantly less modern parts applied.
1

Height

1,532 > 1,359 mm
If you are a tall driver or you tend to carry in the trunk stuffs of large dimensions, the Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual, which is by 173 millimeters higher than the Suzuki, would be better pick for you. However, these two vehicles do not vary much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much observable.
0

End of model sale

2011 > 2004
0

Valves

12 > 6

Suzuki

2 reasons for Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53KM manual in comparison to Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual

Reasons for
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,300 > 3,605 revolutions/minute
The RMP where the maximum torque is produced tells us how fast an engine achieves its best efficiency with increase in revolutions. The lower rotational speed or the wider range at which the torque is the highest, the more the engine is flexible and a sensation of acceleration should be felt earlier.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,700 > 6,000 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Toyota Yaris II Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual Suzuki Swift III Hatchback 1.0 i 53HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2005 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,440 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK