Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d 1.3 92HP manual vs Toyota Starlet IV 1.3 i 16V 75HP manual

Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d 1.3 92HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org Luftfahrrad Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

13 reasons for

Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d, model available from 2004.
It has 1.3 92HP petrol engine produced from 2004.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

3 reasons for

Toyota Starlet IV, model available from 1996 to 1999.
It has 1.3 i 16V 75HP petrol engine produced from 1996 to 1999.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Toyota Starlet IV 1.3 i 16V 75HP manual
Suzuki

13 reasons for Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d 1.3 92KM manual in comparison to Toyota Starlet IV 1.3 i 16V 75HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

92 > 75 hp
The horsepower of the Suzuki is by 17 hp bigger when compared to the Toyota. While the difference is little this should not affect the vehicles performance in a noticeable way.
112

Average consumption

5.9 > 6.5 l
The Suzuki Swift IV uses 0.6 l fewer fuel in the combined cycle in relation to the Toyota. The Suzuki, which is palced in „small cars” segment uses by 0.1 l less fuel than the average in its segment. The average fuel consumption in this class in the combined cycle is 6 l.
33

Top speed

175 > 170 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the ​​Suzuki Swift IV is greater than of the Toyota Starlet IV by 5 kilometers per hour, which allows the Suzuki Swift IV to travel quicker large stretches of highway. The difference at the level of 5 km/h is little and will be insignificant in everyday driving.
22

Width

1,694 > 1,625 mm
The width of the car influences directly on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d is 69 mm wider in comparison to the Toyota Starlet IV. It is often clearly felt by driver and passenger in front, who have more space for their elbows.
15

Wheelbase

2,377 > 2,300 mm
The Suzuki Swift IV has 77 millimeters longer wheelbase than Toyota. As a result the Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d 1.3 92HP manual is more safe and has a better stability. Moreover, longer wheelbase has impact on convenient and more comfortable driving.
8

Maximum load capacity

515 > 440 kg
4

Rear track

1,470 > 1,395 mm
1

Model release date

2004 > 1996
Manufacture of the older vehicle began much more earlier than Toyota Starlet IV hence man may suspect that this vehicle has significantly less advanced technologies used.
1

Height

1,500 > 1,401 mm
If you are a tall driver or you happen to carry in the trunk stuffs of big dimensions, the Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d 1.3 92HP manual, which is by 99 mm higher than the Toyota Starlet IV 1.3 i 16V 75HP manual, would be better option for you. However, presented vehicles do not vary much in its height and it should not be much observable.
0

Payload

1,487 > 1,345 kg
0

Front track

1,461 > 1,400 mm
0

Tire diameter

14 > 13 ″
0

Curb weight

975 > 902 kg

Toyota

3 reasons for Toyota Starlet IV 1.3 i 16V 75KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d 1.3 92HP manual

Reasons for
8

Engine capacity

1,332 > 1,329 cc
The Toyota Starlet IV 1.3 i 16V 75HP manual has by 3 cubic centimeters larger engine size than the Suzuki Swift IV. This play a little role when it comes to car's performance, as both figures does not differ much.
6

Length

3,785 > 3,764 mm
The Toyota Starlet IV is 21 millimeters longer in relation to the Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d. Long vehicles have roomy cabin and also have plenty of trunk space. While the Toyota Starlet IV occurs to be better for families or persons who love the idea of convenient driving, the Suzuki may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause troubles with parking and will be easier for turning in narrow streets.
0

Maximal power RPM

5,400 > 5,800 revolutions/minute

Cars specifications

Suzuki Swift IV Hatchback 3d 1.3 92HP manual Toyota Starlet IV 1.3 i 16V 75HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2004 1996
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,487 kg 1,345 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK