Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual vs Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d 1.2 VVT 94HP manual

Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org All Rights Released into the public domain

19 reasons for

Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d, model available from 2011.
It has 1.0 VVT-i 69HP petrol engine produced from 2011.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d, model available from 2010.
It has 1.2 VVT 94HP petrol engine produced from 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d 1.2 VVT 94HP manual
Toyota

19 reasons for Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69KM manual in comparison to Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d 1.2 VVT 94HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

4.8 > 5.1 l
The Toyota Yaris III consumes 6 % less in the mixed cycle in relation to the Suzuki. The difference at the level of 0.3 l is not realy noticeable. However within some time it would allow you to make a considerable reduction of costs.
56

Urban consumption

5.7 > 6.1 l
The Toyota Yaris III consumes of 7 % gasoline fewer in the urban cycle in comparison to the Suzuki. The Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d, which is classified in subcompact segment, uses 1.8 l per 100 km less than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in the “supermini” class is 7.5 l per 100 km.
38

Trunk capacity

363 > 212 l
The Toyota features 151 l larger trunk in relation to the Suzuki. Such a difference is quite significant so it will distinctly matters when it comes to the comfort of the vehicle’s usage. It is worth to note that the Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d has 64 liters bigger boot capacity than the average in its class. Roomy trunk will be useful during family journeys as well as during daily car’s usage.
33

Trunk capacity with seats down

1,086 > 891 l
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,605 > 4,800 revolutions/minute
A wider range as well as a lower value of rotations at which the maximum torque is reached determines an engine’s effectiveness and dynamism. However, to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is good to analyze a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

4.2 > 4.3 l
22

Width

1,695 > 1,691 mm
The width of the car influences on passanger's inner room and stability of driving. The Toyota Yaris III is 4 mm wider when compared to the Suzuki. It is clearly perceptible by those sitting in front, who have more space for their elbows.
19

Range

875 > 840 km
19

Fuel tank

43 > 42 l
The winner of selected cars in the category of fuel tank size is Toyota Yaris III which is able to carry by 2 percent more fuel compared with the Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d.
15

Wheelbase

2,460 > 2,420 mm
Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual has 40 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Suzuki Swift V. A longer wheelbase provides more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. But, vehicles with a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter length between its axles.
12

Urban range

737 > 689 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,000 > 955 km
6

Length

3,880 > 3,850 mm
The Toyota is 30 millimeters longer than the Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d. Long vehicles are more spacious and in most cases provide bigger trunk. While the Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual occurs to be better choice for families or persons who appreciate convenient rides, the Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d 1.2 VVT 94HP manual may be more appropriate to women because it will not make problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
1

Model release date

2011 > 2010
The difference in debut day between compared vehicles is only 1 year, however, new technologies for automotive industry are appearing at a dizzying pace and for that reason the Toyota Yaris III may feature more modern solutions thanks to which everyday usage of it may be more comfortable.
1

Height

1,512 > 1,511 mm
The higher a car is, the the more convenient is a getting in to it and greater possibility of carrying massive amount of thinks to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 1 millimeter to the advantage of the Toyota Yaris III is not big and does not matter much.
0

Number of seats

5 > 4
0

Front overhang

753 > 818 mm
0

Rear overhang

570 > 598 mm
0

Curb weight

969 > 949 kg

Suzuki

10 reasons for Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d 1.2 VVT 94KM manual in comparison to Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

94 > 69 hp
The Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d is equipped with petrol which produce by 25 more horsepower than the Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d, giving the vehicle a more sporty character. It should be googd car for drivers who would like to experience thrill of getting behind the wheel of a sports car.
59

Maximal torque

118 > 91 Nm
The Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d has 30 % more torque when compared to the Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d. The difference at this level is relevant, what means that the Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d 1.2 VVT 94HP manual will be seeding up perceptibly better.
33

Top speed

165 > 155 km/h
The top velocity of the ​​Suzuki is greater compared with this of the Toyota Yaris III by 6, which allows the Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d to cover quicker long distance of highway. The difference at the level of 6 percent is small and will not be a very noticable in everyday driving.
14

Cylinders

4 > 3
8

Engine capacity

1,243 > 998 cc
The Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d has 245 cubic centimeters larger engine capacity in comparison to the Toyota. Because the difference is little, the Suzuki Swift V should accelerate only slightly better, if other paramerters are the same.
8

Maximum load capacity

535 > 460 kg
4

Rear track

1,493 > 1,460 mm
0

Payload

1,477 > 1,430 kg
0

Front track

1,491 > 1,467 mm
0

Valves

16 > 12

Cars specifications

Toyota Yaris III Hatchback 3d 1.0 VVT-i 69HP manual Suzuki Swift V Hatchback 3d 1.2 VVT 94HP manual
    Price range popular popular
    Model release date 2011 2010
    Facelifting no no
    Class B B
    Payload 1,430 kg 1,477 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK