Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual vs Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual

Source: wikipedia.org S 400 HYBRID All Rights Released into the public domain

13 reasons for

Toyota Auris I Hatchback, model available from 2006.
It has 1.33VVT-i 100HP petrol engine produced from 2009 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 6 speed gearbox.

10 reasons for

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d, model available from 2006 to 2012.
It has 1.6 100HP petrol engine produced from 2006 to 2010.
Drive on the front axle has manual, 5 speed gearbox.

Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual
Toyota

13 reasons for Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100KM manual in comparison to Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual

Reasons for
112

Average consumption

5.8 > 6.9 l
The Toyota Auris I uses 1.1 l less fuel in the mixed cycle in relation to the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d. The Toyota Auris I, which is classified in „lower middle” class consumes by 1 l less fuel than the average in its class. The average fuel consumption in this class in the mixed cycle amounts to 6.8 l.
56

Urban consumption

7.1 > 9.3 l
The Toyota Auris I Hatchback uses 24 % of gasoline fewer in the city in relation to the Volvo. The Toyota, which comes from compact segment, burns up 1.6 l less gasoline, which constitutes by 18 % better result than the average in its segment. The difference in fuel efficiency between compared vehicles is quite big, so remember that in order to the the comparison have a sense, you should pick up cars with similar characteristics.
30

Maximal torque RPM

3,805 > 4,000 revolutions/minute
A greater range and a lower value of revolutions at which the highest torque is delivered has an impact on an engine’s dynamism and flexibility. However, in order to have a full perspective on a car’s engine performance, it is always recommended to see a torque graph.
24

Extra-urban consumption

5 > 5.7 l
19

Range

948 > 743 km
19

Fuel tank

56 > 52 l
In the category of fuel tank capacity it is the Toyota that can hold 8 percent more fuel in relation to the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d. The average fuel container capacity in the C class, from which the Toyota Auris I Hatchback comes from, equals 52 l, whereas in lower middle class (represented by the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d) it is 52 l.
12

Urban range

775 > 559 km
11

Extra-urban range

1,100 > 912 km
10

Number of gears

6 > 5 gears
The Toyota has a one extra speed compared to the Volvo C30. Most often this extra gear is used as an overdrive so that the previous gears can be narrower in order to allow increased acceleration in the lower speeds. One more gear as well have an effect on decreasing fuel consumption and CO2 output.
8

Maximum load capacity

440 > 425 kg
1

Height

1,513 > 1,477 mm
The higher a vehicle is, the the more convenient is a boarding it and greater possibility of putting big amount of luggage to it. The difference between these two cars that amounts to 2 percent to the advantage of the Toyota Auris I Hatchback is not big and does not matter much.
0

Payload

1,721 > 1,700 kg
0

Curb weight

1,280 > 1,274 kg

Volvo

10 reasons for Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100KM manual in comparison to Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual

Reasons for
59

Maximal torque

150 > 126 Nm
Maximum torque of the Volvo is 24 Nm higher than the Toyota. For this reason, the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual will accelerate slightly faster and be better for overtaking other cars. Appropriate use of the flexibility of the engine will also cause that the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual will burn up less fuel for every 100 km.
50

Acceleration 0-100 km/h

11.8 > 13.1 s
A little difference at the level of 1.3 s shows that the Toyota is the worst car of these two presented. In the „C class, being represented by the Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual, the average acceleration amounts to 11.3 s and is by 1.8 s higher than this of Toyota vehicle.
33

Top speed

185 > 175 km/h
The maximum velocity possible to be reached by the Volvo is greater in comparison to this of the Toyota Auris I which allows to cover the same distance on the highway faster. The difference that amounts to 10 km/h is little and is not realy noticable in daily driving.
22

Width

1,778 > 1,761 mm
Distance between two sides of a vehicle affects the amount of space for passengers and also stability during driving. The width of the Volvo C30 is larger only by 17 millimeters in relation to the Toyota Auris I and is not really relevant. The average for the „small family cars” class is 1,703 mm and is by 4 % smaller than the width of the Volvo C30.
15

Wheelbase

2,647 > 2,596 mm
Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual has 51 millimeters longer wheelbase than the Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual. A longer wheelbase gives more stable and comfortable ride, especially at higher speeds. It also provides more storage space. However, vehicles having a longer wheelbase will not be as maneuverable as those with a shorter wheelbase.
8

Engine capacity

1,597 > 1,329 cc
The Volvo has 268 cubic centimeters greater cubic capacity than the Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual. For the reason that the difference is not big, the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual should accelerate only slightly dynamically, of course if other paramerters are the same.
6

Length

4,271 > 4,215 mm
The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual is 1 % longer in comparison to the Toyota Auris I. The length of the vehicle is significant when it comes to travelling comfort and room in the trunk. The Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d very likely will be offering to it's users more room for legs. Aditionally the Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual will be better driven ,however, the Toyota Auris I will be a little easier for parking because of shorter length .
4

Rear track

1,531 > 1,521 mm
3

Price range

luxury > popular
0

Front track

1,535 > 1,527 mm

Cars specifications

Toyota Auris I Hatchback 1.33VVT-i 100HP manual Volvo C30 Hatchback 3d 1.6 100HP manual
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2006 2006
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,721 kg 1,700 kg
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK