Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d 1.8 HSD 136HP automatic vs Volvo 340 Hatchback 1.4 68HP

Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d 1.8 HSD 136HP automatic

Source: wikipedia.org M 93 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany

9 reasons for

Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d, model available from 2013.
It has 1.8 HSD 136HP ic hybrid engine produced from 2013.
Drive on the front axle has automatic gearbox.

2 reasons for

Volvo 340 Hatchback, model available from 1975 to 1991.
It has 1.4 68HP petrol engine produced from 1986 to 1988.
Drive has manual gearbox.

Volvo 340 Hatchback 1.4 68HP
Toyota

9 reasons for Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d 1.8 HSD 136KM automat in comparison to Volvo 340 Hatchback 1.4 68HP

Reasons for
135

Maximal power

136 > 68 hp
The Toyota Auris II has by 100 percent more horsepower compared to Volvo. The Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d 1.8 HSD 136HP automatic will be distinctly more dynamically speed up thanks to bigger power. Also leaving behind other vehicles should be a piece of cake for a vehicle equipped with more powerful motor.
22

Width

1,760 > 1,660 mm
Width of a car directly influences on interior space for travelers and also stability on road. The width of the Toyota Auris II is larger only by 6 percent in comparison to the Volvo and is not really important. The average for the „small family cars” class equals to around 1,703 mm and is by 57 millimeters larger than the width of the Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d.
15

Wheelbase

2,600 > 2,405 mm
The Toyota Auris II has 195 millimeters longer wheelbase than Volvo 340. As a result the Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d is safer and has a better stability. What is more, longer wheelbase influences on convenient and more comfortable riding.
4

Rear track

1,532 > 1,400 mm
3

Number of doors

5 > 3
It seems to be quite obvious that the five-door Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d is more convenient and if you frequently drive with more than one people then it’s the format to go for. The strongest point of a five-door car is that it’s not only easier for passengers to get into the back but it’s as well easier to put luggage and cargo into the vehicle when the rear seats are folded flat. However, three-door cars like the Volvo 340 Hatchback 1.4 68HP very often look more dynamic and sporty and for young drivers who rarely have more than one passengers in the car the Volvo 340 Hatchback 1.4 68HP may be more appropriate, the more so for being a little bit cheaper than the same model with more doors.
1

Model release date

2013 > 1975
1

Height

1,460 > 1,392 mm
If you are a tall driver or you carry in the trunk stuffs of large size, the Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d, which is by 68 millimeters higher than the Volvo 340, is appropriate pick for you. However, compared vehicles do not differ much it the aspect of its height and it should not be much perceptible.
0

Transmission

automatic > manual
Automatic gearbox in the Toyota Auris II despite having a few minuses gives much more better comfort of driving. After a long time spent at the steering wheel you probably would be less exhausted. Also automatic puts less strain on the engine thanks to the factory settings of changing gears in specific revs range.
0

Front track

1,536 > 1,369 mm

Volvo

2 reasons for Volvo 340 Hatchback 1.4 68KM in comparison to Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d 1.8 HSD 136HP automatic

Reasons for
6

Length

4,297 > 4,276 mm
The Volvo 340 Hatchback 1.4 68HP is 21 millimeters longer when compared to the Toyota. Long vehicles have more interior space and usually have more storage space. Although the Volvo 340 Hatchback seems to be better choice for families or persons who love the idea of soft, smooth long-distance rides that make them feel fresh and relaxed upon arriving, the Toyota Auris II may be more appropriate to city drivers as it will not cause problems with parking and will be more maneuverable.
3

Price range

luxury > popular

Cars specifications

Toyota Auris II Hatchback 5d 1.8 HSD 136HP automatic Volvo 340 Hatchback 1.4 68HP
    Price range popular luxury
    Model release date 2013 1975
    Facelifting no no
    Class C C
    Payload 1,844 kg -
By using this site, you agree to the storage and use of cookie files. OK